Have Questions? Contact Us.
Since its inception, NYCLA has been at the forefront of most legal debates in the country. We have provided legal education for more than 40 years.
ETHICS OPINION 189
NUMBER 189 1921
Question. A and B, lawyers, were co-partners. The partnership was dissolved by consent.
Is it ethical, or consistent with professional dignity, for A to attempt to secure professional employment from a former client of the co-partnership who had been originally introduced to the co-partnership by B. and whose affairs had always been in the personal charge of B while the partnership continued, by offering to serve for fees much smaller than the reasonable and substantially uniform fees that had been charged to that client by the co-partnership for the same kind of services?
Would it make any difference if the instance cited were but one of a number, thus indicating a general policy on A’s part to secure, by means of “rate-cutting” employment by those clients of the former firm who, but for such “rate-cutting,” would probably prefer to employ B?
Answer. Canon 7 of the Canons of Ethics of the American Bar Association provides, among other things, as follows: “Efforts, direct or indirect, in any way to encroach upon the business of another lawyer, are unworthy of those who should be brethren at the Bar,” . . . In the opinion of the Committee the principle stated is a correct one, and the circumstances suggested in the question make it applicable; and, consequently, make the practice reprehensible.